Should I upgrade my Nikon dSLR or my tackle lens?
Hi folks!
I have a Nikon D40 and a 18-55 af-s 3.5-5.6 GII ED (non vr) kit lens.
I am looking at Nikon D90 and its 18-105 vr but can't afford both.
Do you mull over I should stretch to buy the D90 and shoot with my current kit lens, or bring back 18-105 vr with my D40?
What would be better upgrade in vocabulary of image quality?
Thanks!!
Answers: Good chalice is forever (well, almost forever). DSLR bodies are transient since they're replaced every 3 to 5 years.
So keep your D40 and begin investing contained by lenses. I'll freely admit to being biased against irregular aperture zoom lenses. The idea of losing lens speed when zooming is untrue in my opinion. The 18-105mm f3.5-5.6 represents a 1 1/3 stop loss contained by shutter speed. What does that mean? Suppose you're shooting at 18mm at f3.5 at ISO 400 and your shutter speed is 1/125 sec. If you zoom out to 105mm your f-stop becomes f5.6 and your shutter speed will drop to ~ 1/40 sec. To compensate for this you'd own to increase your ISO to 1000 to keep your shutter speed at 1/125sec. (ISO 1000 is 1 1/3 stops faster than ISO 400).
I suggest investing in the AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 70-200mm f2.8G IF-ED lens as your first focal upgrade to your system. This is not a cheap lens but with reasonable strictness your grandchildren will be using it. It is 2/3 of a stop faster than the f3.5 but more importantly its a full 2 stops faster than f5.6 and its a constant aperture from 70mm to 200mm. The f2.8 will also be more useful in low-light photography.
You can save your 18-55mm kit lens until your budget allows another lens.
If the 70-200mm f2.8 is simply beyond your current budget, I suggest buying the new AF-S Nikkor 50mm f1.4G. A prompt prime lens is always useful. Source(s): 37 + years of enjoy and learning about photography.
Because the lens have such a wide range(from wide-angle to telephoto) you are going to majorly suffer on image point. If you want a telephoto that won't bust your budget look into the 70-200vr or the 70-300vr. If you get a "do-all" lens your image element is going to go down(vignetting(black corners),chromatic aberrations(purple pixels as an outline)).
The D90 will permit you to enjoy much more control over the settings(aperture/shutter speed). If you can still find the D80 get it! It costs less because: It doesn't own video recording(not like a video camera...you cannot pan..if not you will have warping) and less megapixels(unless you are cropping or printing sour bigger than 8x10... 10MP is fine)
Check out the site in my sources for reviews on lenses Source(s): http://www.photozone.de/nikon--nikkor-ap…
Related Questions:
I have a Nikon D40 and a 18-55 af-s 3.5-5.6 GII ED (non vr) kit lens.
I am looking at Nikon D90 and its 18-105 vr but can't afford both.
Do you mull over I should stretch to buy the D90 and shoot with my current kit lens, or bring back 18-105 vr with my D40?
What would be better upgrade in vocabulary of image quality?
Thanks!!
Answers: Good chalice is forever (well, almost forever). DSLR bodies are transient since they're replaced every 3 to 5 years.
So keep your D40 and begin investing contained by lenses. I'll freely admit to being biased against irregular aperture zoom lenses. The idea of losing lens speed when zooming is untrue in my opinion. The 18-105mm f3.5-5.6 represents a 1 1/3 stop loss contained by shutter speed. What does that mean? Suppose you're shooting at 18mm at f3.5 at ISO 400 and your shutter speed is 1/125 sec. If you zoom out to 105mm your f-stop becomes f5.6 and your shutter speed will drop to ~ 1/40 sec. To compensate for this you'd own to increase your ISO to 1000 to keep your shutter speed at 1/125sec. (ISO 1000 is 1 1/3 stops faster than ISO 400).
I suggest investing in the AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 70-200mm f2.8G IF-ED lens as your first focal upgrade to your system. This is not a cheap lens but with reasonable strictness your grandchildren will be using it. It is 2/3 of a stop faster than the f3.5 but more importantly its a full 2 stops faster than f5.6 and its a constant aperture from 70mm to 200mm. The f2.8 will also be more useful in low-light photography.
You can save your 18-55mm kit lens until your budget allows another lens.
If the 70-200mm f2.8 is simply beyond your current budget, I suggest buying the new AF-S Nikkor 50mm f1.4G. A prompt prime lens is always useful. Source(s): 37 + years of enjoy and learning about photography.
Because the lens have such a wide range(from wide-angle to telephoto) you are going to majorly suffer on image point. If you want a telephoto that won't bust your budget look into the 70-200vr or the 70-300vr. If you get a "do-all" lens your image element is going to go down(vignetting(black corners),chromatic aberrations(purple pixels as an outline)).
The D90 will permit you to enjoy much more control over the settings(aperture/shutter speed). If you can still find the D80 get it! It costs less because: It doesn't own video recording(not like a video camera...you cannot pan..if not you will have warping) and less megapixels(unless you are cropping or printing sour bigger than 8x10... 10MP is fine)
Check out the site in my sources for reviews on lenses Source(s): http://www.photozone.de/nikon--nikkor-ap…
Related Questions:
- Nikon D3100 or D5000?
- Can someone please impart some counsel on DSLR cameras and lenes?
- What do you feel the adjectives holds for DSLR digital cameras?
- What is best point and shoot camera? Are bright ones coming out soon that I should skulk to buy?
- Can anyony recommend a good SLR digital camera for around 350?